Choosing Developmental & Corrective Progressions
When choosing progressions, it is important to consider whether the student needs a developmental progression or a corrective progression. Developmental and corrective progressions have the same end goal in mind: to help the student progress as a rider. Developmental progressions are intended to build and create skills that are completely new to your student, whilst corrective progressions are intended to change and improve movement patterns and performance with the goal of making the student’s riding more efficient.
The bulk of sample progressions within this manual are developmental progressions. However, many of the same activities can be used to change movements and performance when used within a corrective progression. The purpose and focus for each task may differ and the way you present it will undoubtedly alter; however, the task itself may remain the same. The Activity-Analyse-Adapt cycle is extremely useful when learning how to use an activity or task outside of a sample progression.
Developmental Progressions using Stationary-Simple-Complex-Freeride
Developmental progressions are designed to teach completely new skills. A good formula for how to structure the teaching of these new skills is the Stationary-Simple-Complex-Freeride approach.
Stationary
Simple
Complex
Freeride
Example
Corrective Progressions using Whole-Part-Whole
As instructors, it is usually our intention to help students develop new skills; however, almost all lessons will require corrective teaching at some stage. For intermediate and advanced students, corrective teaching is often used from the beginning of the Skill/Adventure stage of the lesson. The main goal of corrective teaching is to help make their riding more efficient by adjusting and adapting their current skills.
A good corrective progression should start with identifying what to correct and knowing why it would be beneficial to correct it. This information may come from the students (e.g. they know they are struggling to commit to their toeside turn when it gets a bit steeper) or it may come from the instructor through the analysis process (e.g. the instructor notices an inefficient toeside initiation on a warm-up lap during the Play stage of the lesson). With either scenario, the instructor must have an ideal image in their mind of what the task or skill looks like.
Correcting a student’s inefficiency may be as simple as slowing down their riding or moving them to easier terrain to reinforce an existing movement or skill. Major stance or movement issues will require a little more attention. Stationary and simple exercises are often useful here, followed up with a complex or freeride task that allows the student to experience the changes within their usual riding.
More experienced instructors may spend time working on stance options and specific body parts, using range, timing and power. This is where the Whole-Part-Whole method can be useful…